Learning Contracts?

I like the article in todays Guardian by Germaine Greer criticising the plan by Oxford to force students to sign contracts and attend lectures. Greer has some points I agree with :

“Lectures are a misshapen survival of medieval pedagogy, which took authority as absolute and understood the teacher’s sole duty to be that of expounding it”

is one – the article is well worth reading in full (http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,1699238,00.html )

A learning contract in itself might not be a bad idea, if it encourages students take responsibilty for their learning, but Oxford have got it completely wrong – they are using the contracts solely to protect themselves from being sued for poor quality teaching. This is typical of the defensive mentality of many universities, something which I have often been critical of – we cannot run a university on the basis that we spend all our time worrying about being sued, we need to create postive learning communities based on trust and respect.

The Greer & Sutherland article also raises interesting questions about the value of ‘lectures’ I have long held that the ‘lecture’ where information passes from the lecturer’s notes to the students notes without passing through the mind of either one, is indeed a waste of time. This is an issue which I will return to again and again, but I do broadly agree with Greers idea about handing out the ‘lectures’ on DVD for students to watch, and using the scheduled class for discussion and interaction.


Posted

in

by

Comments

One response to “Learning Contracts?”

  1. Michael Martin Avatar

    Inclined to agree that contracts are not a good idea. I think the present day obsession with statistical performance analysis is shallow capable of manipulative interpretation.

    PS enjoying the War, State and Society Lectures!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php